The Firm was successful in defeating plaintiff’s motion for a TRO in an action where our client was accused of violating copyrights, trademarks, and committing acts of unfair competition.
Representing the accused trademark infringer, following minimal discovery, the Firm negotiated a settlement in which the competitor/plaintiff agreed to pay our client $75,000 to convert to a new mark. The settlement also permitted our client to exhaust its remaining inventory of products before converting to its new mark.
The Firm represented the accused infringer in a declaratory judgment action brought to clear our client’s right to use ARONEX. The Firm negotiated a settlement in which our client was permitted to continue to use ARONEX in its corporate name and on product labels.
We represented a prominent manufacturer of automotive products in a case brought against parties that were manufacturing and shipping infringing goods overseas for distribution. The Firm successfully affected ex parte seizures simultaneously at three locations, and secured a final judgment of statutory and common law trademark infringement, and damages in our client’s favor.
Our client, a prominent supplier of air conditioning and heating equipment and services, discovered a competitor using its trademark to confuse customers and pilfer business. The Firm was successful in obtaining a preliminary injunction and ultimately a permanent injunction and final judgment in our client’s favor.
The Firm’s client was accused of misappropriating the trademark of a Fortune 500 company. Following discovery, which focused on who had adopted and used the trademark first, a settlement was entered in which the plaintiff purchased our client’s trademark rights for $160,000.